The avoid–shift–improve (ASI) framework is a conceptual tool to help policymakers and managers deliver maximum services for the fewest energy requirements and environmental harm.
ASI prescribes managing demand first and multiplies the possibilities for electrification.
ASI directs the following:
- Avoid unnecessary demand for a service in the first place.
- Shift remaining demand to inherently lower-impact modes, energy carriers, places, or times.
- Improve the efficiency and cleanliness of technologies and infrastructure that still serve that demand.
ASI was coined for transportation, but it generalizes for energy-using activities more widely.
Transportation: avoid trips and vehicle-kilometers; shift to walking, cycling, transit, rail, coastal shipping; improve vehicles, fuels, operations.
Buildings and cities: avoid loads via passive design/right-sizing; shift to district energy and electrified end-uses and to cleaner times with demand response; improve envelopes, controls, appliances.
Industry and materials: avoid through material efficiency, reuse, and product longevity; shift to recycled feedstocks and electrified or hydrogen-based processes; improve motors, drives, heat integration, high-temp heat pumps.
Power systems: avoid peaks and losses; shift the generation mix to low-carbon sources and demand to low-carbon hours; improve plant and grid efficiency (advanced inverters, reconductoring, storage).
Digital/ICT: avoid unnecessary compute/data movement; shift workloads to low-carbon regions/times; improve chips, cooling, and utilization.
Issues it addresses include climate mitigation, air quality and health, congestion and reliability, resource and land use, energy security, affordability, and resilience.
Who should care
National and local policymakers, planners, and regulators (NDCs, CAPs, land-use/transport codes, building energy codes).
Utilities, ISOs/RTOs, and energy planners (resource adequacy, demand response, electrification).
Corporate leaders across fleet, real estate, operations, procurement, and product design.
Investors and lenders (capex timing, stranded-asset risk, transition plans).
NGOs, researchers, and community groups shaping equitable, demand-side solutions.
Anyone setting climate, cost, or reliability targets who must deliver results this decade.
Where it comes from
Origins: Early 2000s within the sustainable transport community, especially German development cooperation. The approach was codified and popularized through GTZ’s (now GIZ) Sustainable Urban Transport Project (SUTP) and partners.
A widely cited early synthesis is Dalkmann and Brannigan’s GTZ SUTP Module “Transport and Climate Change” (2007). Regional development banks (notably ADB) and networks like SLOCAT then embedded ASI in guidance and programs.
Beyond transport: ASI migrated into buildings, industry, and power as demand-side mitigation rose in prominence (e.g., IPCC AR6).
From modes to moments: “Shift” now includes shifting in time (load flexibility, demand response) as much as shifting modes or carriers.
From three pillars to four: Many practitioners add “Enable” to emphasize institutions, finance, pricing, design standards, and data that make ASI stick.
Integration with circular economy and sufficiency: “Avoid” increasingly overlaps with product longevity, reuse/repair, and service sufficiency.
Equity and co-benefits: Modern ASI practice foregrounds distributional impacts, access, and health, not just carbon metrics.
More rigorous metrics: Better methods to quantify rebound effects, lifecycle emissions, and system interactions help prioritize high-impact measures.
Why it matters—and what goes wrong if you ignore it
Faster, cheaper decarbonization: Avoid and shift measures often deliver near-term, low-cost cuts and reduce the scale of supply-side buildout needed.
Lock-in avoidance: Managing demand and mode/carrier choices now prevents expensive, high-carbon infrastructure lock-in and stranded assets later.
System reliability and resilience: Avoiding peaks and shifting to flexible demand can stabilize grids and networks under stress.
Multiple co-benefits: Clean air, safety, space efficiency, and affordability strengthen public support and create immediate value.
If you ignore ASI, you risk over-relying on “improve” (efficiency/clean tech) alone, which is slower to saturate and vulnerable to rebound effects.
You are likely to overbuild supply and networks, raising costs and exposure to delays, siting constraints, and public opposition.
You miss no-regrets options and equity gains that can make transitions durable.
You may still miss climate targets even with rapid tech deployment, because unmanaged demand and mode choices swamp improvements.
Moreworks 