Urbanism isn’t about forcing anyone to live a certain way. It’s about giving people more choices: the ability to live near daily needs, get around safely without a car if they want to, and afford a good home in a neighborhood that works for all ages and abilities. Here are 15 myths—and what the evidence and practice actually show—about middle-infill housing, transit-oriented development, 15-minute neighborhoods, safe streets, protected bikeways, road diets, parking reform, and frequent transit.
1. Myth: “More housing means more traffic.”
Fact: Putting homes near jobs, schools, and shops shortens trips and reduces driving overall. Transit-oriented development cuts vehicle miles traveled and emissions. “Road diets” and safer design move just as many people, more reliably. Building far from destinations lengthens every trip—that’s what clogs roads.
2. Myth: “Middle housing will ruin
neighborhood character and tank property values.”
Fact: “Missing middle” homes (duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, cottage courts, ADUs) fit the scale of existing blocks when design standards focus on building form, not unit count. Gentle density gives teachers, nurses, elders, and young families attainable options, while stabilizing values and local businesses.
3. Myth: “15-minute neighborhoods are a war on cars.”
Fact: They’re a win for choice and convenience. You can still drive when it makes sense; you just don’t have to. When errands are walkable or bikable, roads and parking free up for trips that truly need a car. The result is less traffic, not more.
4. Myth: “Transit is a money pit because no one rides.”
Fact: Frequency and reliability drive ridership. Buses that come every 10–15 minutes, use all-door boarding, and get dedicated lanes or signal priority attract riders and lower cost per trip. Per person, moving people by bus or train is far cheaper than widening roads and building more parking.
5. Myth: “Protected bike lanes are only for the young and athletic—and they kill local business.”
Fact: Physical protection invites riders of all ages and abilities. After protection goes in, cities see big jumps in biking and fewer injuries. Retail corridors with protected lanes often see equal or higher sales because bikes and foot traffic bring more frequent, local customers.
6. Myth: “Road diets cause gridlock and make streets less safe.”
Fact: Converting four fast lanes to three (with a center turn lane) typically cuts severe crashes 20–50% by reducing speeding and left-turn conflicts. With better signal timing and safer speeds, person-throughput stays the same or improves—especially when paired with transit and bikeways.
7. Myth: “Without parking minimums there won’t be enough parking.”
Fact: Minimums force everyone to pay for abundant, often empty parking. When cities right-size or remove minimums, builders still provide parking where it’s needed—and not where it’s not. On-street space can be managed with fair pricing, permits, and loading zones. Shared parking, unbundled parking, and better travel options keep availability high without inflating rents and prices.
8. Myth: “Parking is free.”
Fact: “Free” parking is expensive to build and maintain. Its costs are baked into housing and goods whether you drive or not. Smarter curb management, demand-based pricing, and alternatives like transit and safe biking are cheaper and fairer than mandating more asphalt.
9. Myth: “Density increases crime.”
Fact: Design, not just density, shapes safety. Active ground floors, good lighting, eyes on the street, and mixed uses improve natural surveillance. Areas with more people around at more times of day often see fewer serious incidents than isolated, car-only environments.
10. Myth: “Infill just accelerates gentrification and displacement.”
Fact: The biggest driver of displacement is the shortage of homes in high-demand areas. Allowing more homes—paired with anti-displacement tools like rental assistance, right-to-return policies, community land trusts, social/affordable housing, and targeted homeownership support—relieves pressure and helps long-time residents stay.
11. Myth: “Safe-street designs slow emergency response.”
Fact: Modern designs are built with fire and EMS in mind. Standard 10–11 ft lanes, mountable curbs, speed cushions with wheel cut-outs, signal preemption, and emergency access planning keep response times on target. Safer everyday speeds reduce the number and severity of crashes that tie up responders.
12. Myth: “Bikeable, transit-friendly design is bad for seniors and people with disabilities.”
Fact: It’s better for them when done right. Smooth sidewalks, curb ramps, benches, shade, audible signals, shorter crossings, slower speeds, and mid-block refuges make walking and rolling safer. Frequent, accessible transit with level boarding, priority seating, real-time info, and strong paratransit/microtransit connections increases independence. Protected bike lanes reduce sidewalk cycling and conflicts, making sidewalks calmer for mobility devices.
13. Myth: “A four-lane arterial must stay four lanes; kids should ride on a different street.”
Fact: Arterials are where schools, parks, and shops often are. Safe, direct routes matter—especially for kids. Converting four lanes to three, adding protected bike lanes and better crossings, calms speeds, cuts crashes, and preserves person-capacity. “Just use a side street” often means longer, discontinuous, or unsafe detours that families won’t use.
14. Myth: “Drivers pay for roads, so drivers should decide how we spend.”
Fact: User fees like gas taxes and registration cover only a portion of road costs. Local streets and many arterials are funded by property, sales, and general taxes that everyone pays. Because we all fund the system, investments should prioritize safety, access, and moving the most people efficiently—not just moving cars.
15. Myth: “Instead of adding homes near jobs and schools, just run more intercity buses.”
Fact: Regional buses are great—but they’re complements, not substitutes, for housing near daily destinations. Long commutes cost families time and money, strain roads, and push emissions up. No bus can replace living near childcare, groceries, and community. The recipe is both/and: abundant homes near jobs plus strong regional transit.
Why this matters
Affordability: Gentle infill and parking reform lower housing costs. Transportation is the second-largest household expense; living closer to daily needs cuts that bill.
Safety: Designing for safe speeds and predictable movements protects people walking, rolling, biking, and driving—especially kids, elders, and people with disabilities.
Health and climate: Shorter trips, more transit, and safe biking/walking mean cleaner air and healthier communities.
Economic vitality: Walkable, transit-served main streets support local businesses and increase tax revenue per acre, easing long-term budget pressures.
Inclusion: Universal design and frequent, accessible transit expand independence for seniors and people with disabilities.
How you can help in your city
Support zoning updates that allow ADUs and middle housing near jobs, schools, and transit.
Back bus lanes, transit signal priority, and frequent service on busy corridors.
Champion protected bike lanes and safer arterial designs to connect schools, parks, and shops.
Ask for parking reform: unbundle parking, manage curbs with fair pricing, and remove blanket minimums.
Pair growth with anti-displacement tools developed with community leadership.
Engage seniors and disability advocates early to shape accessible streets, stops, and stations.
Urbanism is about giving people back time, money, safety, and choice—so neighborhoods work better for everyone, not just for cars.
Moreworks 